For the first time the U.S. government has mandated public access to research funded by a major agency. This week President Bush signed into law the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2007 (H.R. 2764) which includes a provision directing the National Institutes of Health (NIH) to provide the public with open online access to findings from its funded research.
Researchers will now be required to deposit electronic copies of their peer-reviewed articles into the National Library of Medicine’s online archive, PubMed Central. Full text articles will be publicly available and searchable in PubMed Central no later than 12 months after publication in a journal.
It is hoped that open access will make scientific results more readily available and ultimately facilitate the advancement of scientific knowledge. "This policy will directly improve the sharing of scientific findings, the pace of medical advances, and the rate of return on benefits to the taxpayer,” said Heather Joseph, Executive Director of SPARC (the Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition).
More information can be found at http://www.taxpayeraccess.org/
News and comment on science and on information sources and services for our library patron community, compiled by the librarians at UMass Amherst's Science and Engineering Library.
Thursday, December 27, 2007
Friday, December 21, 2007
Questioning the validity of journal impact factors
In a recent editorial in the Journal of Cell Biology the executive editors of The Journal of Cell Biology and The Journal of Experimental Medicine joined with the executive director of the Rockefeller University Press to test the validity of data associated with journal impact factors. For those unfamiliar with the calculation it is a measure of the number of cites to recent articles compared to the number of recent articles for a given period. In other words, the impact factor for a given year measures the average number of times a paper published in the previous two years was cited during the year in question.
For example, the journal impact factor for the journal Nature is reported to be 26.681 calculated from the following data:
Cites in 2006 to articles published in:
2005 = 25820
2004 = 26022
Sum = 51842
Number of articles published in:
2005 = 1065
2004 = 878
Sum = 1943
Calculation = Cites to recent articles / Number of recent articles = 51842 / 1943 = 26.681
The authors of the editorial tried to replicate the journal impact factors from data supported by Thomson Scientific (owners of the Web of Science) and were unable to report the same results. This puts into question the data supplied by Thomson Scientific and the overall validity of journal impact factors. One wonders if journal impact factors should be given the importance that they are within the scientific community given the fact that they might be calculated from suspect data.
For example, the journal impact factor for the journal Nature is reported to be 26.681 calculated from the following data:
Cites in 2006 to articles published in:
2005 = 25820
2004 = 26022
Sum = 51842
Number of articles published in:
2005 = 1065
2004 = 878
Sum = 1943
Calculation = Cites to recent articles / Number of recent articles = 51842 / 1943 = 26.681
The authors of the editorial tried to replicate the journal impact factors from data supported by Thomson Scientific (owners of the Web of Science) and were unable to report the same results. This puts into question the data supplied by Thomson Scientific and the overall validity of journal impact factors. One wonders if journal impact factors should be given the importance that they are within the scientific community given the fact that they might be calculated from suspect data.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)